How we reviewed this: from the project’s own documentation, published audits and independent security research.
The wallet that runs most of DeFi is no longer Ethereum-only — Solana, Bitcoin and Tron all arrived in the last eighteen months. The swap fee has not moved since 2020, and it is roughly three times what the cheapest rivals charge.
By the CryptoNorth Team
MetaMask is the default key to decentralised finance. If you want to use a lending protocol, mint an NFT, connect to a DEX or interact with almost any Ethereum-based application, this is the wallet those applications assume you have. Over 30 million people use it monthly[3], and that ubiquity is genuinely the product — things simply work with it.
It is not a savings wallet. It is a hot wallet — one whose keys sit on an internet-connected device — living in a browser extension or phone app, and its risks come almost entirely from what you connect it to. Used as an operational account with a hardware wallet behind it, it is excellent. Used as the place your crypto lives, it is a mistake.
Pairing with a Ledger or Trezor is the single most valuable change you can make to a MetaMask setup holding real money — you keep the interface and move the keys offline.
For most of its life MetaMask meant EVM chains and nothing else, and advice to that effect — including ours until now — is out of date. Native support arrived for Solana in May 2025, Bitcoin in December 2025 and Tron in January 2026[1][2].
Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base, Avalanche, BNB Smart Chain, Solana, Bitcoin and Tron — all derived from a single recovery phrase through a multichain account model[1].
Deriving Bitcoin and Solana addresses from the same seed as your DeFi wallet is convenient and worth thinking about. One phrase now controls more of your holdings, which raises the cost of losing it or exposing it. Many people deliberately keep long-term Bitcoin on a separate seed for exactly this reason.
MetaMask takes a 0.875% service fee on every in-app swap, unchanged since the feature launched in October 2020. It is applied inside the quoted rate rather than shown as a line, and it sits on top of the underlying pool fee of roughly 0.05% to 0.3% and network gas[1][2].
MetaMask has collected roughly $198.6 million in cumulative swap fees since October 2020, running at about $52.9 million a year[3]. That is what a fee most users never see as a line item looks like at scale. The competing wallet Rabby charges 0.25% for the same function[1].
You are not obliged to pay it. Connecting MetaMask to a decentralised exchange directly and trading there costs you the pool fee and gas without MetaMask's cut. The in-app swap buys convenience and route aggregation, which is worth something — just not always 0.875%. On a $5,000 swap that is about $44.
MetaMask offers pooled ETH staking for any amount through StakeWise contracts, and full 32-ETH validator staking. Both carry a commission: reported as 10% of profits on validator staking and 15% on pooled staking[2]. That is lower than Wealthsimple's 30% cut but higher than running your own validator, which costs nothing but effort and competence.
Staking is unavailable to users in the United States and United Kingdom for regulatory reasons[1]. Our sources do not state MetaMask's position for Canada, so check in-app rather than assuming availability either way. Whatever the platform, staking rewards are taxable income in Canada at their CAD value when received — see our tax guide.
MetaMask's own security record is unremarkable in the best sense. Two incidents of note: a 2022 disk-cache bug, and a 2023 breach at a third-party support vendor affecting around 7,000 users. Neither compromised custody of anyone's funds[1].
Losses happen a different way. Because MetaMask is the key to DeFi, it is the most heavily targeted wallet in crypto, and the attacks are aimed at you, not the software: phishing sites that mimic real protocols, and drainer contracts that ask you to sign an approval which quietly authorises someone to empty a token balance.
Consensys founder Joseph Lubin has confirmed a MetaMask token is planned, but it has not launched[1]. Any site, email or message inviting you to claim, pre-claim or check eligibility for a MetaMask token today is phishing, and connecting your wallet to it is how people lose everything. Current MetaMask Rewards seasons pay out in LINEA tokens, through the app itself.
MetaMask is frequently called open source, and our own comparison page said so until now. The accurate position: the major repositories are public and readable, and the code has been audited by firms including Cure53, but it has been under a source-available proprietary licence since 2020 rather than an OSI-approved open-source one, with no reproducible-build process[1][2].
In practice you can read the code, which is the part that matters most for security. You cannot freely fork and redistribute it, and you cannot verify that the extension you installed was built from the source you read. That is a real distinction from Trezor, and it is why we have removed the open-source badge. MetaMask is owned by Consensys, the US company founded by Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin.
Yes. Native Bitcoin support arrived in December 2025, alongside Solana in May 2025 and Tron in January 2026. Older advice that MetaMask is Ethereum-only, including what this site said until August 2026, is out of date. One caution: those accounts derive from the same recovery phrase as your DeFi wallet, so a single phrase now controls more of your holdings. Many people still keep long-term Bitcoin on a separate seed.
MetaMask takes 0.875% of the swap, built into the quoted rate rather than shown separately, plus the underlying pool fee of roughly 0.05-0.3% and network gas. On a $5,000 swap MetaMask’s share is about $44. Rabby charges 0.25% for the same job, and connecting MetaMask directly to a decentralised exchange avoids MetaMask’s cut entirely.
The software has a good record - two minor incidents in ten years, neither compromising custody. The danger is directed at you rather than the code: phishing sites imitating real protocols, and drainer contracts that get you to sign an approval granting access to your tokens. Reaching sites only through your own bookmarks, reading what you sign, and pairing a hardware wallet removes most of the risk.
No. A MASK token has been confirmed as planned but has not launched. Every site, email or DM currently offering a MetaMask token claim, airdrop or eligibility check is a scam, and connecting your wallet to one can cost you everything you hold. Existing MetaMask Rewards seasons pay in LINEA tokens through the app itself, not through any external claim page.
Not strictly. The repositories are public and readable and the code has been audited by firms such as Cure53, but MetaMask has used a source-available proprietary licence since 2020 rather than an OSI-approved open-source one, and there is no reproducible-build process. You can read the code; you cannot verify that the build you installed came from it. Trezor’s firmware is the fully open-source comparison.
This review is for informational purposes only and is not financial or security advice. Fees, chain support and regional availability change — confirm current details in the app before relying on anything here. A hot wallet in a browser always carries more risk than dedicated hardware.
Download only from metamask.io. Never install an extension from a search advert — that is how drainers spread.